“The Question of Photographic Meaning in Roland Barthes’ Camera Lucida” is an essay by the philosopher Lior Levy (University of Haifa), published in Philosophy Today in 2009 (vol. 53, no. 4). It proposes an original reading of Barthes’s last book, focused on time and on what Levy calls a new, sensitive kind of sight.
Neither only mourning nor only theory
Levy notes that interpretations of Camera Lucida tend to fall into two camps. Some read it as a personal text about mourning, written after the death of Barthes’s mother. Others treat it as a case of psychoanalysis or as a general theory of photography. Levy rejects both. Barthes, he argues, does leave behind the structural semiology of his earlier texts, but he does not withdraw into a private, speechless realm. The book is a repeated attempt to put the essence of photography into words and to share it.
Photography and time
At the heart of the essay is the temporal relation between three terms: the photograph, the person or thing photographed, and the viewer. Levy reconstructs how Barthes’s thinking develops towards this relation, which he believes has been misread or ignored in philosophical discussions. Photographic meaning, in this reading, is not a code to be decoded but an event in time: the encounter, in the present, with someone who was there and is now gone.
The Winter Garden photograph
Levy follows Barthes’s search through the photographs of his mother. Most of them, Barthes writes, show her only “in fragments”: he recognises her, yet misses her being. Levy compares this with an everyday experience: a security guard who checks a face against an identity card recognises the person without really seeing them. Only the Winter Garden photograph, showing his mother as a five-year-old child with her brother, finally “meets” her. For Levy this shows that a photograph can reveal the uniqueness of a person, and through it the uniqueness of our own existence, which we usually forget.
Why read it
The essay is a rigorous philosophical companion to Camera Lucida, useful for readers who want to go beyond the studium and punctum and understand Barthes’s claims about time and existence.
Key ideas
Levy’s reading highlights three points. First, Barthes’s turn away from semiology is not a renunciation of meaning; it is a search for a different kind of meaning, rooted in time rather than in codes. Second, the photograph matters because it relates three moments: the moment of exposure, the existence of the person photographed, and the present of the viewer. Third, the experience of “missing” someone in most of their photographs is philosophically revealing: it shows that likeness is not the same as presence, and that a single image can sometimes restore what many others fail to show.
Reference
Lior Levy, “The Question of Photographic Meaning in Roland Barthes’ Camera Lucida”, Philosophy Today, vol. 53, no. 4, 2009, pp. 395–406. The article is protected by copyright; see the PhilArchive record or the journal.
1 thought on “Lior Levy on Photographic Meaning in Barthes’s Camera Lucida (2009)”